|
| Current Affairs Greenvest CIS transcript |
| Best viewed in Internet Explorer Browsers Netscape Browsers do not recognize some W3C standards. |
COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENTA Planned Community Charles Town and Middleway Districts Jefferson County, West Virginia April 19, 2001 Prepared for THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONCharles Town, West Virginia By Appalachian Surveys of West Virginia, L.L.C. P.O. Box 35 / 120 North George Street Charles Town, West Virginia 25414 (304) 725-4572 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Tables - (follows Page 16) [tables 1, 2, 3 and 4 available at this time]
[exhibits 6 and 7 available at this time]
|
BASIC DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION
1. Name, Address
of Owner F & M Bank - Winchester
c/o Michael Bryan 9 Court House Square Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-4334 2. Name, Address
of Developer Greenvest L.C Jim Duszynski, Senior Vice President 8614 Westwood Center Drive Suite #900 Vienna, VA 22182 (703) 442-8992 3. Name, Address
of Contact Person F
& M Bank – Winchester c/o Michael Bryan 9 Court House Square Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-4334 Greenvest L.C Jim Duszynski, Senior Vice President 8614 Westwood Center Drive Suite #900 Vienna, VA 22182 (703) 442-8992 Engineering/Surveying R. Michael Shepp, PS Appalachian Surveys of West Virginia, L.L.C. P.O. Box 35 Charles Town, WV 25414 (304) 725-4572 Master
Plan – Community Planning, Land Planning Lee Quill AIA, Principal Cunningham + Quill Architects PLLC 1054 Thirty First Street, N.W. Suite 315 Washington, D.C. 20007 (202) 337-0090 Public
Relations – Community Relations Kathy Holmes Holmes Communications 6 West Alexandria Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22301 (703) 519-3728 Housing Market Analysis
Deborah L. Rosenstein, President Rosenstein Research Associates 1568 Spring Hill Road, Suite 102 McLean, Virginia 22102 (703) 848-1940 Transportation – Traffic
Michael Workosky Wells & Associates, LLC 1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 600 McLean, Virginia (703) 917-6620 Transportation – Regional Transit
Albert Eisenberg 817 North Irving Street Arlington, Virginia 22201 (703) 276-9414 Legal
Counsel Peter L. Chakmakian P.O. Box 597 Charles Town, WV 25414 (304) 725-9797 3. Tract Size, Shape, Location (See Exhibit 1) Located approximately one
mile south of the City of Charles Town, the tract consists of approximately 480
acres on the southeast side of West Virginia Route 13, between Route 13 and the
railroad track; and approximately 519 acres between the railroad track and old
U.S. Route 340 (West Virginia Route 340/13), totaling in all just under 1000
acres. The 480 acre parcel is zoned Residential Growth. The 519 acre parcel
is zoned Light
Industrial-Commercial-Residential Growth. The entire tract lies within the
current designated and proposed Residential Growth Area shown on the County
Comprehensive Plan. 4-5. Project
Design and Layout: Approximate Size, Location of Lots (See Exhibits 5, 6 & 7) Located in the designated
Residential Growth Area, the new Hunt Field is designed as an extension of the City of
Charles Town. The master plan design
calls for approximately six (6) new residential mixed-use neighborhoods, ¼ mile
walking distance from their center, patterned after the neighborhoods of
Charles Town, Ranson, Shepherdstown, Bolivar and Harpers Ferry. Respectful of its location adjacent to
historic Claymont and downtown Charles Town, and cognizant of the site’s
rolling topography, the centers of each neighborhood are located at topographic
high points, thus ensuring views to and from the site are focused on civic
spaces, civic buildings and neighborhood parks. Characteristic of the
above noted towns of Jefferson County, the new neighborhoods will be compact in
design and layout, to preserve natural open space. Parks and other civic uses are located within a five minute walk
of all resident’s homes. Larger scale
regional recreation open spaces (soccer/play fields, baseball fields, etc.),
which will be available to all Jefferson County residents, are located
throughout the community as part of the project’s connected and distributed
open space system design. One hallmark of great
neighborhoods is a hierarchy of well designed, pedestrian friendly
streets. The streets of Hunt Field will
vary in size and character from small neighborhood tree lined streets to a
broad central tree lined park boulevard.
Streets will have wide sidewalks, street trees, coordinated human scale
street lighting and signage. Major and
minor streets are designed for the pedestrian first, then the automobile,
ensuring livability as well as mobility. A mixture of housing
types, including single family, townhouses and multi-family apartments, will be
woven into the neighborhoods avoiding “pods” of single use development. The
total number of residential units to be developed, over the 20-year build-out
period, will consist of approximately 1,950 single-family units (on lots of
varying size, ranging from 6,000 to 15,000 square feet), 800 townhouse units,
and 450 multifamily units. Located in the eastern
village and the central village centers, community serving retail, will be
located at the ground floor of low scale, appropriately designed commercial
buildings fronting on major streets or civic spaces. Smaller scale “corner markets” will also be located near the
center of several neighborhoods. The
neighborhood retail and village scale commercial office components of the
project will be developed as soon as market demand is present. As part of the important
civic component of the master plan, approximately 75 acres will be set aside for two school sites. Modeled after Wright Denny Elementary in
Charles Town, the school sites are designed to be a major community asset and
part of the neighborhood fabric.
Additionally, land will be set aside for other important civic and
institutional components such as churches, a public safety building (fire-EMS
& police), a community center/small branch library and recreation center.
The recreation center will be constructed by the developer for the use of
residents of the Hunt Field community. The project will be a
“planned unit neighborhood development” which will be developed over a period
of approximately 20 years. Central water and sewer will serve all of the
property. The City of Charles Town will provide water and wastewater treatment.
The Jefferson County Public Service District will provide sanitary sewer
collection. 6. Topography The area proposed for
development has gentle to moderate slopes, and primarily consists of open
meadow with some wooded areas to the west. (See Exhibit 2) 7. Soil and
Drainage Characteristics
(See Exhibit 3) The soils on the site consist of: Duffield series (DgB,
DgC, and DgC3), that consist of deep, well-drained soils, and have slight to
moderate limitations for building sites and roads. Hagerstown series (HbB,
HbC, and HeC3), that consist of deep, well drained, silt loams. They have slight to moderate limitations for
building sites and roads. Hagerstown
and Frederick series (HfB, HgD, and HgC), that consist of deep, well
drained, cherty silt loams. They have
severe limitations for building sites and roads due to rock outcrops. Frankstown
series
(FbB and FbC) consist of deep, well-drained soils. They have slight to moderate limitations for building sites and
roads. Lindside
series
(Lo) consist of deep, nearly level, moderately well drained, soils. They have severe limitations for building
sites and roads due to flooding. Huntington
series
(Ho) consist of deep, nearly level, well drained, soils on flood plains of
streams and along drainageways. They
have moderate limitations for building sites and roads. According to Geology of
the Berryville, Charles Town, Harpers Ferry, Middleway, and Round Hill
Quadrangles, Berkeley and Jefferson Counties, West Virginia MAP-WV 35 published
by the West Virginia Geological and
Economic Survey dated 1990, the geology of this site is Harpers Formation
which is in the Elbrook Group. It is
comprised of argillaceous, dolomitic limestone; typically weathers to a dark
yellow color; chert and oolites present throughout the formation; thin sandy
beds near the middle. The prior agricultural use of the property as an apple orchard
resulted in the contamination of some soils with pesticides, specifically lead
arsenate. The developer is working with the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection on appropriate remediation of elevated arsenic levels in
the soils and will provide an executed agreement between DEP and the developer
prior to approval of the final plat for the first phase of the project. 8‑9. Existing
Site Features The site is relatively
flat and open through the middle of the property with a wooded area to the
west. It has areas of woods, areas of dense thick brush, and some high open
areas. There are several farm
buildings, houses, and farm related structures throughout the property. The North Fork of the Bullskin Run crosses
the property on the southwest. There is
a railroad passing through the property.
The drain of an unnamed wet weather stream crosses the east of the
property. Winchester Cold Storage has a
right-of-way to access its property to the northeast. 10. Existing
Easements, Rights‑of‑Way There is a railroad right-of-way passing
through the property and an access easement for the property to the northeast. 11. Existing
Covenants and Restrictions None 12‑13. Approximate
Size, Etc., of Areas to be Dedicated, Intended Improvements The community master plan
design has established areas of the site that will have dedicated neighborhood
parks, active play fields, passive natural and historic resource areas and
noise buffer areas. Additionally, 75 acres will be dedicated to the Jefferson
County Board of Education for future school construction and a minimum of 10
acres will be set aside for civic / institutional buildings (noted
previously). There will be areas
dedicated for storm water management and water quality and there will be area
set aside for two water storage tanks. There will also be a new vehicular &
pedestrian bridge spanning the railroad adjacent to the central village center. 14. Intended
Land Uses Please reference Sections 4-5 and 12-13 above. See also Table 2
“Site Tabulation”. 15. Intended
Earthwork The cutting and/or
filling for road construction. The
necessary grading for site improvements and drainage control. 16. Proposed
Covenants and Restrictions See Exhibit 8. 17. Tentative
Schedule It is estimated that it
will take approximately five months to obtain necessary approvals for the first
phase of the project. The development
will be “Final Platted” in sections of approximately 50 - 100 lots per section. There will be approximately two sections
platted per year depending upon market conditions. Construction will begin on the required infrastructure in the
fall of 2001. The infrastructure needed
for Section I will be completed by spring of 2002. See also Table 1 – “Project
Schedule”. 18. Market,
Feasibility Study See Attachment 1 for the Market Feasibility
Study conducted by Rosenstein Research Associates. 19. Project Cost The estimated project
cost excluding building construction and land cost is $ 35,200,000.00 20. Funding
Sources The project will be
funded privately. No State funds have
been requested. COMMUNITY IMPACTS PHYSICAL IMPACTS 1. Earthwork a.
The site will be stripped only in areas where necessary,
primarily roads, lots, and in the commercial areas; b.
There is no visible rock on site; however, some blasting
is likely. Adjoining property owners
will be protected if blasting is required; c.
The site will probably be a balanced site. Any excess materials will be spread on site,
borrow materials if required will be provided on site; d.
The overall drainage pattern will not be changed;
however, stormwater will be routed through drainage ditches, drainage
easements, and other drainage structures and devices as needed. Stormwater management will be provided via
storm water management ponds as needed; e. The terrain will be altered as necessary to
accommodate the grading for roads, driveways and houses. 2. Conversion of Farm Land (See Exhibit 5) While this site
is presently utilized for agricultural purposes, this site is part of the
designated growth area, designed to focus future development in the county
around existing towns and infrastructure. The current farming operation is on a
“leased acreage” basis and has operated under an agreement with F&M Bank –
Winchester since the bank received the property through a deed in lieu of
foreclosure. It is the intention of the developer to continue to lease
undeveloped acreage to the current lessees under a similar agreement. As
previously noted, focusing growth into growth areas/boundaries is a nationally
recognized “smart growth” implementation tool to preserve agricultural
resources. Additionally, the current zoning for the property and the current
comprehensive plan support the proposed development. 3. Wildlife Populations There are
no known rare or endangered species of wildlife indigenous to this site. The
DNR has made a formal evaluation of this site. Wildlife populations will not be
affected although some nests or dens of individual animals may be displaced.
See attached letter. 4. Groundwater and Surface
Water Resources ·
A
request has been submitted to the Jefferson County Health Department for data
on contaminated wells within 1000 feet. No response was received. No homes will
be served with individual wells. The City of Charles Town will perform all
tests on the existing wells to insure suitability for potable use. ·
The
North Fork of the Bullskin Run crosses the southwestern corner of the
property. An unnamed wet weather stream
crosses the northeastern end of the property. This Bullskin is well defined
with stable, vegetated banks. ·
Stormwater
management will be provided via storm water management ponds as needed. 5‑6.
Visual Compatibility, Sensitive Natural Areas Visual
Compatibility: The
new Hunt Field master plan design acknowledges and embraces it’s important
location adjacent to the historic resources of Claymont, Blakeley, and the City of Charles Town and Ranson. As noted previously in this document, the
centers of the neighborhoods (neighborhood parks and civic/institutional
buildings) are tied to the important visual connections to be experienced
between the historic sites and Hunt Field.
Additionally, the new neighborhoods of the development respond in a
compatible way, both in juxtaposition of residential use and neighborhood
design, to the historic Claymont property and the residential subdivisions of
Locust Hills and Tuscawilla on the north side of West Virginia Route 13, and
Locust Hill Golf Course. Sensitive
Natural Areas: The North Fork of the Bullskin Run crosses
the property between Claymont and the railroad. This is a sensitive natural
area, and a wetland. This natural resource will be protected in a buffer area
and included as part of the connected open space system of the project. Located
close to the center of the site is the Winchester Cold Storage facility and the
railroad right-of-way. Both of these
existing conditions will be buffered,
where appropriate, from the planned surrounding neighborhood and institutional/civic
uses. An unnamed wet weather stream extends across the northeastern end of the
property between the railroad and Old Rt. 340. This intermittent stream will be
utilized for stormwater management and water quality controls. SOCIAL IMPACTS
7. Demand for
School Services Information provided by the
Jefferson County School Board indicates that there are 0.50 school age children
for each single-family residence in Jefferson County. This is further broken down as follows: 0.27 elementary, 0.12
junior high, and 0.11 senior high. The
number of children for each townhouse is 0.18.
This is broken down as 0.11 elementary, 0.04 junior high and 0.03 senior
high. The number of children for each apartment is 0.28. This is broken down as 0.18 elementary, 0.05
junior high and 0.05 senior high. See also Table 3 “School Enrollment” for a
breakdown of annual enrollment by school age (Elementary, Middle, and High
School) ·
5‑8: [[{1950 x 0.27 = 526.5} + {800 x 0.11 = 88} +
{450 x 0.18 = 81}] x 0.57 = 396.4] Kindergarten through Third Grade students
would attend Page Jackson Elementary School which has a 2000 -2001 enrollment
of 562, a program capacity of 504 students.
·
12-l4: [{1950 x 0.12 = 234} + {800 x 0.04 = 32} + {450 x
0.05 = 22.5}] = 288.5 Seventh through Ninth Grade students would attend Charles
Town Jr. High School which has a 2000 -2001 enrollment of 814, a program
capacity of 742 students. ·
15-17: [{1950 x 0.11 = 214.5} + {800 x 0.03 = 24} + {450
x 0.05 = 22.5}] = 261 Tenth through Twelfth Grade students would attend
Jefferson High School, which has a 2000 -2001 enrollment of 1418, a program
capacity of 1349 students. The
developers of Hunt Field have set aside 75 acres for future school construction
at the request of the Jefferson County Board of Education. It is the
developer’s intention to provide a graded site for the future construction of
schools by the Board of Education. There will be paved roads and utilities
fronting the sites and all stormwater management, wetlands permitting and
wetlands mitigation will be provided at the developer’s expense. Additionally,
the developer has been meeting with the school superintendent over the past
year discussing appropriate impact fees for costs of educating students and
capital improvements. Working with the School Board, the developer will agree
to make a voluntary contribution which represents the costs associated with
educating the students generated by the project. 8. Traffic a.
The 1996 West Virginia Department of Highways traffic
count for West Virginia Route 340/13 is 600, West Virginia Route 340/16 is
3100, and for West Virginia Route 13 is 2700.
(Note: a detailed traffic study has been provided previously and is part
of the file.) b.
This development at build-out, in 20 to 30 years, will
generate 24,450 trips per day [(2,100 S.F. x 8.0 per D.U. = 16,800) + (750 T.H.
x 6.0 per D.U. = 4,500) + (450 M.F. x 7.0 per D.U. = 3,150) = 24,450]; peak
hour flow will be 2,445 trips [(2100
S.F. x 0.8per D.U. = 1,680) + (750 T.H. x 0.6 per D.U. = 450) + (450 M.F. x 0.7
per D.U. = 315)] = 2,445. c.
The nearest key intersections are West Virginia Route
340/13 with the Charles Town bypass, the intersection of West Virginia Route
340/13 with West Virginia Route 51 and the intersection of West Virginia Route
13 with West Virginia Route 51. e.
There are two intersections designated in the
Comprehensive Plan as "problem areas" within 1 mile of the site. The
intersection of West Virginia Route 13 with West Virginia Route 51, and a sharp
curve on West Virginia Route 13. f.
The ordinance does require a traffic study for a
development generating this level of traffic. A traffic study has been
submitted previously and is part of the file. The developer
agrees that all frontage improvements and intersection improvements adjacent to
the property will be at the developer’s sole expense. The developer further
agrees to pay a proportionate share of any additional road improvements
required which directly result from the traffic generated by the project. Such
improvements will be phased based upon traffic demands. 9. Demographic The "HOUSING ANALYSIS EASTERN PANHANDLE COUNTIES OF
BERKELEY, JEFFERSON, AND MORGAN", dated January 1992, and prepared by the
WEST VIRGINIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND projected the annual housing needs in
Jefferson County at approximately 300 units per year until the year 1995. This development will potentially provide
3,300 homes over approximately a 20-year period. According to the 1995 Census, there are 2.68 residents per
household in Jefferson County. Considering
this projection, this development at build out will house approximately 8,844
persons. Projections by the County
Engineer indicate that the number of residents per new household is 1.92. According to projections by the WV Housing
Development Fund, the figures are 1.89 persons per dwelling unit for new
dwelling units for 1990-1995 and 1.75 persons per dwelling unit for new
dwelling units for 1995-2000. 10. Emergency
Medical Facilities Jefferson
Memorial Hospital has adequate facilities to provide a broad range of medical
services and meet the emergency needs of the residents. There are also hospitals in Martinsburg,
Hagerstown, Frederick, Winchester and Leesburg. 11‑12.
Fire and Police The development
site lies within the Charles Town Fire District and would be served by the
Citizen’s Fire Company and the Independent Fire Company. The West Virginia State Police and the
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department both have jurisdiction at the development
site. Additionally, land will be
set aside for future Fire-EMS & Police community building, as may be
needed, in one of the neighborhoods or village centers. 13. Trash
Removal Trash
removal could be provided by Waste Management Inc. 14‑15.
Electric and Telephone
The site
will be served by the Allegheny Power Company and the Citizen's Communications,
both of which have adequate facilities to provide these services. 16. Water and
Sewer Service
The City
of Charles Town will provide water.
Initially Charles Town will provide water through wells on site. The City of Charles Town proposes to bring
its municipal water system to the site after approximately 400 units are
constructed. There are two water tank
or tower sites proposed on the property. The developer has entered into an
agreement with the City of Charles Town for the provision of water. The
agreement is under review by the Public Service Commission. The
Jefferson County Public Service District will provide sewer services. The developer will design and construct a
sewer hookup to Jefferson County’s system to the PSD’s specifications. The developer has an executed agreement with
the PSD which has received final approval by the Public Service Commission. 17. Relationship
of Project to Comprehensive Plan (See Exhibit 5) In order to manage and direct future growth toward established
towns in Jefferson County, the designated Residential Growth Area is an
effective tool in addressing the scattered pattern of development called urban
sprawl. Like its nationally recognized
counter part in Portland, Oregon, the designated Residential Growth Area is
designed to “channel” new development, generally over a twenty (20) year
period, into designated areas near existing public facilities and utilities in
an effort to preserve existing agricultural resources. The new neighborhoods of Hunt Field are
located in the designated Residential Growth Area surrounding Charles
Town. Focusing growth within the Residential Growth Area, however, is
not enough. It is also critical to the
protection of these special and historic places, to model future growth after
historic town precedents and patterns that have worked for hundreds of
years. It is also critical to the
preservation of Jefferson County’s agricultural heritage. The new master plan
for Hunt Field patterns it neighborhoods after the street, block and land use
precedents found in Charles Town, Ranson & Shepherdstown to ensure a high
quality of development within the Residential Growth Area. The property is zoned Residential Growth and Residential
Growth-Light Industrial-Commercial. Under RESIDENTIAL LAND USE the
Comprehensive Plan recommends “…encouraging a variety of housing types
throughout the County…To provide a choice of suburban, semi-rural, and rural
living environments…Residential land use policies should build on the Zoning
Ordinance and continue to create orderly development patterns and discourage
scattered development…The extension of public facilities such as water, sewer,
and treatment plants should be consistent with residential land use policies…” Research of the Jefferson
County Planning and Zoning Department records yield the information shown in
Table 4 “Subdivision Approval Record”. This data is provided to illustrate the
standards of community acceptability and the standards of conformance, required
by the Planning Commission, with the existing zoning ordinances regulating the
Community Impact Statement and Subdivision review and approval process. 18. Housing
Supply This
project will contribute 3200 housing units to Jefferson County. The variety of
housing types, products, and prices will allow buyers of all income ranges an
opportunity for the rental and/or purchase of quality housing in a planned
community not available elsewhere in Jefferson County. 19. Historic
Sites The developer
intends to utilize all available resources in the identification, avoidance,
and preservation of existing historic and cultural resources on the property.
The developer commits to providing necessary studies and reports which confirm
the intention to avoid or mitigate impacts to historic and cultural resources
prior to submitting any final plats to the Planning Commission for approval. As has been
noted previously, the new master plan for Hunt Field will fully acknowledge and
work sensitively with the historic sites through overall and specific
neighborhood design and protection of noted historic resources (Prospect
Hill, Bushrod Washington’s early house, Braddock Ridge and well sites, etc…)
on site, as well as the neighboring historic property of Claymont. 20. Recreation A connected,
open space network of both passive and active, well designed open spaces is a
central concept of the new master plan for Hunt Field. In addition to neighborhood parks being located
in each neighborhood, regional active open space (such as soccer/play fields,
baseball fields, etc. available to all County residents) will be part of the
network of open space located to facilitate ease of pedestrian access by
walking or biking. The
walking/biking paths will interconnect with the sidewalk network to make the
entire community pedestrian/bike friendly.
Additionally, the developer will construct tennis courts, volleyball
courts and a basketball court. Future
civic components and buildings include an Olympic size swimming pool, with a
shower and locker facility and a Community Center. ECONOMIC IMPACTS
21. Property Tax Evaluation It is estimated that the development
will generate $3,200,626 annually in property taxes based on the following: ·
Jefferson County Property Tax Guide, Class II Tax Rates ·
Appraised value of project: $437,818,181 (with
dwellings) ·
Assessed value:
(60% of above figure) $262,690,909. ·
Total County Tax Rate:
1.2184/$100 ·
Tax Computation: $262,690,909 divided by $100 times
1.2184 equals $3,200,626 |
| END OF TRANSCRIPTION |
| As your community Webmaster, I have included this transcript as soon as possible. Please notify the Cloverdale Webmaster for questions regarding this site's transcript. I thank Greenvest L.C. for providing this transcript in that it shares open communication and increases education on a large project which will profoundly affect Cloverdale Heights as well as the county in which we all live. |
![]() Comments |